Eating their own: New York Times claims white liberal parents are blocking the success of black and brown children

When it comes to black and brown children excelling at school, the biggest barrier to their achievement, according to The New York Times, is white liberal women.

In a new podcast it released called “Nice White Parents,” the Times argues that black and brown children need to overcome “white parents,” which are supposedly “the most powerful force in our schools” that is holding black and brown children back from reaching their full potential.

Specifically calling out liberal white parents who claim that black and brown lives matter, but who tend to send their white children to exclusive, all-white schools, the Times says that white parents are creating massive barriers for black and brown children to achieve the same successes in life as their white counterparts.

Many liberal white parents believe that sending their children to anything other than all-white schools would set their little ones up for failure by exposing them to less gifted and less talented blacks and browns. Thus, the Times is taking these folks to task for their blatant hypocrisy, which ironically is perpetuating more of the very same systemic racism that these white liberals claim to oppose.

“Apart from the complex educational issues at play – including the inflammatory suggestion that minorities need to be around whites to succeed – the podcast reflects the left’s broader effort to demonize an unlikely group as it seeks to reduce every issue in American life to questions of race: liberal white women,” writes J. Peder Zane for Real Clear Politics.

“Trump-supporting conservatives and ‘patriarchal white males’ are still in their crosshairs, but these women, long considered key allies in the cause, have become chief targets,” Zane adds.

White liberals are incapable of self-reflecting on their own hypocrisy

Times columnist Charles M. Blow wrote a piece back in May in which he expressed his rage over “white women weaponizing racial anxiety.” He further described his angst as being directed at white women who use their “white femininity to activate systems of terror against black men.”

Despite paying upwards of $2,500 a pop to host “Race2Dinner” meals, which aim to vilify white people and expose their “systemic injustices,” white liberal women are quickly becoming enemy number one of the left, which sees them as overly sensitive hypocrites who are easy to exploit, but who serve no legitimate purpose in the leftist agenda.

In his book White Fragility, Robin DiAngelo explicitly calls out the liberal white people in general, whom he describes as “average, well-intended” people “who see themselves as open-minded, and yet cannot answer the question: ‘What does it mean to be white?’”

DiAngelo goes on to vilify “white progressives” as being the “most challenging” in terms of activating and spreading the far-left agenda “because we tend to be so certain that it isn’t us” who need to change.

In other words, liberal white people are the least likely to self-reflect, and the most likely to self-project. Everyone else is always the problem, but never themselves, and the far-left agenda-pushers are taking notice of this as they seek to activate the next phases of their anti-white societal purge.

“If there is an endgame here besides the accrual of power and control, it is advancing the idea that being a nice person is no longer enough. Now that the vast majority of Americans are non-racists, the push is for everyone to become ‘anti-racist,’ which is a whole different deal,” writes Zane.

“Anti-racists are expected to actively strive each day to dismantle what they say is the systemic injustice that defines America. It means seeing every act as a political act that supports the existing tyranny if it doesn’t purposefully seek to dismantle it.”

For more related news about lunatic liberalism, be sure to check out Libtards.news.

Sources for this article include:

RealClearPolitics.com

NaturalNews.com