08/13/2020 / By Ethan Huff
After announcing her as his running mate, Joe Biden gushed about how Kamala Harris is supposedly a “fearless fighter for the little guy, and one of the country’s finest public servants.” But how can this be true when Kamala was a quintessential bad cop during her tenure as San Francisco’s chief prosecutor?
In his book Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite, Peter Schweizer explains how Kamala failed to prosecute even one case of child sex abuse by Roman Catholic priests, despite having numerous cases thrown her way.
During the 13 years that Kamala was a district attorney, and later attorney general, she systematically covered for the big guys while betraying the little guys – though you are unlikely to hear about any of this from the mainstream media, which is worshiping Kamala almost to the degree that it worshiped Barack Obama.
While at least 50 other major cities at that time were busy prosecuting pedophile priests for molesting and raping young boys, Kamala “would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred,” Schweizer contends. Kamala also retaliated against a district attorney who tried to do the job that she refused to do, almost as if she herself was secretly guilty.
“The bombshell details show that while Harris’s predecessor, former San Francisco District Attorney Terence Hallinan, had launched an aggressive investigation into priests of the Archdiocese of San Francisco accused of sexual abuse, Harris’s campaign to unseat Hallinan showed an unusual influx of unparalleled donations from high-level officials of the Catholic Church,” writes Dr. Susan Berry for Breitbart News.
By the way, more news about corrupt Kamala is available at KamalaHarris.news.
The very same woman who now wants to control the amount of red meat that Americans are allowed to eat was nowhere to be found in pursuing actual justice against heinous child sex abusers who were taking advantage of innocent children within the confines of religion, which is about as heinous as it gets.
“Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums,” Schweizer writes, noting that Kamala maintained deep financial ties to the religious child sex abusers she sought to protect.
Over the course of many years, various Roman Catholic organizations and individuals trying to protect the reputation of their religion amid compiling evidence of pedophilia among its leadership essentially paid off Kamala to keep these crimes under wraps – and it worked marvelously.
“Though Harris has touted her early career as a sexual crimes prosecutor, after she won her run-off campaign against Hallinan, her office actually worked to cover up the records of claims of sexual abuse by priests of the San Francisco archdiocese,” Dr. Berry further notes.
Kamala’s office claimed at the time that it did this to protect the child victims of sex abuse at the hands of Catholic leadership. But how does burying vital records and refusing to prosecute criminals in any way amount to protection? The only people protected were Kamala’s donors, which just goes to show the type of person she actually is, despite all the praise and worship from the mainstream media.
“When Harris attempted to shift the blame for hiding the records to Hallinan, her predecessor responded that she engaged in ‘the kinds of deals that have allowed the church sex scandal to go on as long as it has,'” Dr. Berry further reveals, pegging Kamala as being complicit in these sex crimes against children.
Is this monster really the best pick for vice president, and possibly even president in the event that Biden either croaks or is removed from office for being mentally impotent?
Read more about Kamala Harris at KamalaWatch.com
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under: bribery, buried records, child sex abuse, complicit, conspiracy, corruption, Cover-Up, deep state, Kamala, Kamala Harris, left cult, pedophile, Pedophilia, Roman Catholic Church
COPYRIGHT © 2018 SOCIALJUSTICE.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. SocialJustice.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. SocialJustice.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.